http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/23/us/obama-to-attend-memorial-service-for-victims-of-navy-yard-shooting.html?hp&_r=0
"Obama to Attend Memorial Service for Victims of Navy Yard
Shooting"
This
article was written for the New York Times by journalist Michael D Shear. Shear
is a white house correspondent for the New York Times, and has also for
the Washington Post. He this article as a response to the shooting at the Navy
Yard. He announces that there will be a memorial service for the victims this
coming Sunday, and that the Obamas will be attending to honor the victims.
While Shear’s explicit purpose is to report the news of the memorial service,
the article goes on with a more implicit purpose: a commentary on the gun law
controversy in America.
Shears
is unhappy with the reoccurrence of each shooting, as well as the way they are
being handled politically. Though this is a professionally written news
article, and not an opinion piece, hints of impatience and frustration can be
detected in Shear’s tone. “It has become an
all-too-familiar role for Mr. Obama[…] At each event, the president has sought
to find the right balance between the sadness of a nation and the anger of its
citizens,” Shears writes, “But the memorial services have also served to
provide Mr. Obama with the emotional power to fuel his gun-control efforts.” Shear’s
tone implies that he feels that Obama is exploiting these tragedies in order to
pass gun control legislation. However, Shears seems even further frustrated that
despite Obama’s “emotion power,” no drastic change have been made in gun
legislation. He writes, “there is little evidence that lawmakers’ positions on
gun violence have shifted much in the past several months. And with Congress
locked in a bitter fight about the debt and the budget, there appears to be
little appetite on Capitol Hill for another battle over guns.”
Shear’s
frustration expressed through his tone likely resonates with many Americans,
who are also disappointed with the lack of changes made to gun laws, especially
in light of recent tragedies. However, Shear’s article definitely has more
liberal biases, and is likely more effective to politically-left Americans.
While I don’t think Shear’s article is strong enough to sway a conservative
gun-advocate, (but then again it is
supposed to be an unbiased news piece) it definitely portrays the frustration
felt by many Americans.
A make shift memorial at the Washington Navy Yard
N.d. Photograph. The Week. The Week, 19 Sept. 2013. Web. 22 Sept. 2013. <http://theweek.com/article/index/249934/dont-try-to-make-sense-of-mass-shootings>.

No comments:
Post a Comment